ABSTRACT
IDDF-2023-ABS-0156 Table 1Association between Tolerance of BP for index colonoscopy and surveillance rateTolerance of BP for index colonoscopy Surveillance rate% (n/N) Total 67% (127/186) 1. Very intolerable 47% (9/19) 2. Intolerable 48% (10/21) 3. Neither tolerable nor intolerable 76% (55/72) 4. Tolerable 71% (22/31) 5. Very tolerable 72% (31/43) P for trend test 0.04 IDDF2023-ABS-0156 Table 2Risk factors of non-compliance of surveillance colonoscopy by multivariate regression analysis Multivariate OR (95%CI) p value Age,/1-year increase 1.04 (1.03-1.05) 0.001 Male sex 1.13 (0.85-1.52) 0.40 BMI,/1-kg/m2 increase 1.05 (0.96-1.15) 0.28 Family history of CRC 0.93 (0.16-5.25) 0.92 Low education 0.92 (0.39-2.15) 0.90 Comorbidities 1.05 (0.51-2.13) 0.90 Low tolerance of BP for colonoscopy 2.45 (1.11-5.41) 0.006 Absence of primary care physician 4.63 (1.60-13.4) 0.001 BMI: body mass index, CRC: colorectal cancer, BP: bowel preparation IDDF2023-ABS-0156 Table 3The reasons of non-compliance surveillance colonoscopyReasons of non-compliance surveillance colonoscopy n, (%) Total 62 (100%) Not knowing about follow-up intervals 4 (6%) Having no symptoms 15 (24%) Fear of examination Pain during colonoscopy 1 (2%) Embarrassment during colonoscopy 0 (0%) Bowel preparation for colonoscopy 17 (28%) Over sedation during colonoscopy 2 (3%) Old age/severe illness for surveillance 10 (16%) Having no time 10 (16%) Having no money 1 (2%) Fear of Covid-19 infection 2 (3%) IDDF2023-ABS-0156 Figure 1ConclusionsOur findings highlight the need for improvement of the surveillance colonoscopy rate, especially for patients who had poor tolerance to BP on index colonoscopy and no gastroenterology visit. Providing a well-tolerated BP regimen may lead to an increase in surveillance colonoscopy compliance.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. An on-going coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a challenge all over the world. Since an endoscopy unit and its staff are at potentially high risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, we conducted a survey for the management of the gastrointestinal endoscopic practice, personal protective equipment (PPE), and risk assessment for COVID-19 during the pandemic at multiple facilities.Methods. The 11-item survey questionnaire was sent to representative respondent of Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Hospital, and its 19 related facilities.Results. A total of 18 facilities submitted valid responses and a total of 373 health care professionals (HCPs) participated. All facilities (18/18: 100%) were screening patients at risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection before endoscopy. During the pandemic, we found that the total volume of endoscopic procedures decreased by 44%. Eleven facilities (11/18: 61%) followed recommendations of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES); consequently, about 35%-50% of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy were canceled. Mask (surgical mask or N95 mask), face shield/goggle, gloves (one or two sets), and gown (with long or short sleeves) were being used by endoscopists, nurses, endoscopy technicians, and endoscope cleaning staff in all the facilities (18/18: 100%). SARS-CoV-2 infection risk assessment of HCPs was conducted daily in all the facilities (18/18: 100%), resulting in no subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection in HCPs.Conclusion. COVID-19 has had a dramatic impact on the gastrointestinal endoscopic practice. The recommendations of the JGES were appropriate as preventive measures for the SARSCoV-2 infection in the endoscopy unit and its staff.